인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Since the establishment of the National Research Council for Economics and Social Sciences and the National Research Council for Humanities in 1999, which oversaw state-funded research institutes in the humanities and social sciences, and their merger into the National Research Council of Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences in 2005, efforts to build a “Korean think tank” have been ongoing. However, confusion over the central identity of research institutes’ goals and roles has persisted for a long time. This article argues that a fundamental cause of the repeated confusion is the lack of evaluation of the public nature of the knowledge produced by national research institutes, and suggests that a ‘Korean-style’ path to securing publicity begins with expanding bottom-up agenda setting. First, this paper discusses a theoretical conceptual framework that suggests that the publicness of knowledge produced by think tanks should be evaluated by the extent to which it forms an intersection between the state, civil society, and academia. Then, through a keyword analysis of 796 research projects conducted by the Nationa Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences in the 2010s, we show that the institute has almost exclusively produced knowledge with a top-down agenda. In the conclusion, I propose that the institute should secure the publicness of its knowledge by creating a “productive tension” between the state, civil society, and the academic sphere through securing channels for bottom-up agenda-setting, and discuss the issues that need to be addressed in the future of humanities and social science think tanks.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090643113