인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
In this paper, I examine the textual history and its literary implications in the production of D. H. Lawrence’s Studies in Classic American Literature, as well as the significant changes in the foundational concepts of textual studies and the resulting contradictions at play in the transition from print to digital editions. I argue that the most fundamental issue at stake in the production of critical editions, whether print or digital, is the recognition that literary reading and textual reading are interdependent. After demonstrating the limitations of an understanding predicated on the binary of textual and literary reading, I explore the possible remediation of critical editions in digital form, arguing that combining the demands for precision of both textual and literary criticism is now more than ever a necessity as digitization becomes irreversible. By paying attention to the dynamics created by complex interdependence between literary and textual reading, the following discussion argues for a central role for literary reading in the construction of digital critical editions, while highlighting the inherent limitations of digital technology in this regard. The conclusion emphasizes the active engagement of humanities scholars in the digitization of knowledge, and the critical role that the politics of textual studies can play and fail to play.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
