인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study is to reinterpret Sartori"s hegemonic party system model to empirically evaluate whether the Russian party system can be classified as a hegemonic party system. Voter stabilization was assessed by analyzing the effective number of parties and electoral volatility in State Duma election results. The potential for regime change was examined through the proportionality of the State Duma, the seat share of the ruling party, United Russia, and the duration of its dominance.
During the 1990s, frequent establishment and dissolution of minor parties led to high effective numbers of parties and significant electoral volatility. However, following amendments to party laws and changes in the electoral system in the 2000s, the Russian party system is now considered relatively stable. Conversely, the tightening of party registration conditions and the restoration of the single-member district system significantly reduced the proportionality of the State Duma. Over five elections, United Russia secured an overwhelming majority of seats, transforming Russia into a hegemonic party system with limited political competition.
However, Russia"s hegemonic party system differs from the ideological hegemonic systems of socialist-era Poland or the pragmatic hegemonic systems of Mexico, which relied on hegemonic consensus to create regimes. United Russia"s victories are based on support and loyalty to President Putin, resulting in a "one-person hegemonic party system" within Russia"s political framework.
During the 1990s, frequent establishment and dissolution of minor parties led to high effective numbers of parties and significant electoral volatility. However, following amendments to party laws and changes in the electoral system in the 2000s, the Russian party system is now considered relatively stable. Conversely, the tightening of party registration conditions and the restoration of the single-member district system significantly reduced the proportionality of the State Duma. Over five elections, United Russia secured an overwhelming majority of seats, transforming Russia into a hegemonic party system with limited political competition.
However, Russia"s hegemonic party system differs from the ideological hegemonic systems of socialist-era Poland or the pragmatic hegemonic systems of Mexico, which relied on hegemonic consensus to create regimes. United Russia"s victories are based on support and loyalty to President Putin, resulting in a "one-person hegemonic party system" within Russia"s political framework.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-090938694
