메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第171輯
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    From the liberation until 2007, the history curriculum and textbooks in Korea have undergone numerous challenges in line with domestic and international political changes, as well as demands from academia and educational fields. In particular, since the post-colonial issues were more important in history than in other school subjects, there were considerable difficulties surrounding revisions of the curriculum and textbooks. Among these challenges was the structure of historical narratives, which varied from period to period concerning the interrelationship between Korean, Eastern, and Western history education. The issue was whether to adopt a dichotomous structure of national history and world history, or a tripartite structure of national, Eastern, and Western history. This was important because the difference in perception of these individual history subjects, and the domestic and international environment surrounding them, were as great as the political changes home and abroad.
    Immediately after the liberation, the previously established tripartite structure was maintained, although the content on Japanese history was reduced. However, following the Korean War, anti-communism, the spread of the “Chinese Communist Party” narrative, and the deepening of Eastern stagnation theory led to the return of a dichotomous structure used during the Korean Empire, that of national history and world history.
    Since then, efforts to resolve the historical conflicts between Korea and Japan, along with Korea’s democratization, culminated in the introduction of “East Asian History” textbooks in 2007. This also marked the revival of the tripartite structure. However, the creation of “East Asian History” holds historical significance as it was different from the previous tripartite structure: a Korean history still bound to colonial views, a Western history focused on Western Europe, and an Eastern h istory centered around China. Instead, it was composed of a Korean history that broke away from colonial views, a World history centered around exchange and trade, and an East Asian history that emphasizes the relationship between Korea, Japan, and China.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-090929337