인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
From the liberation until 2007, the history curriculum and textbooks in Korea have undergone numerous challenges in line with domestic and international political changes, as well as demands from academia and educational fields. In particular, since the post-colonial issues were more important in history than in other school subjects, there were considerable difficulties surrounding revisions of the curriculum and textbooks. Among these challenges was the structure of historical narratives, which varied from period to period concerning the interrelationship between Korean, Eastern, and Western history education. The issue was whether to adopt a dichotomous structure of national history and world history, or a tripartite structure of national, Eastern, and Western history. This was important because the difference in perception of these individual history subjects, and the domestic and international environment surrounding them, were as great as the political changes home and abroad.
Immediately after the liberation, the previously established tripartite structure was maintained, although the content on Japanese history was reduced. However, following the Korean War, anti-communism, the spread of the “Chinese Communist Party” narrative, and the deepening of Eastern stagnation theory led to the return of a dichotomous structure used during the Korean Empire, that of national history and world history.
Since then, efforts to resolve the historical conflicts between Korea and Japan, along with Korea’s democratization, culminated in the introduction of “East Asian History” textbooks in 2007. This also marked the revival of the tripartite structure. However, the creation of “East Asian History” holds historical significance as it was different from the previous tripartite structure: a Korean history still bound to colonial views, a Western history focused on Western Europe, and an Eastern h istory centered around China. Instead, it was composed of a Korean history that broke away from colonial views, a World history centered around exchange and trade, and an East Asian history that emphasizes the relationship between Korea, Japan, and China.
Immediately after the liberation, the previously established tripartite structure was maintained, although the content on Japanese history was reduced. However, following the Korean War, anti-communism, the spread of the “Chinese Communist Party” narrative, and the deepening of Eastern stagnation theory led to the return of a dichotomous structure used during the Korean Empire, that of national history and world history.
Since then, efforts to resolve the historical conflicts between Korea and Japan, along with Korea’s democratization, culminated in the introduction of “East Asian History” textbooks in 2007. This also marked the revival of the tripartite structure. However, the creation of “East Asian History” holds historical significance as it was different from the previous tripartite structure: a Korean history still bound to colonial views, a Western history focused on Western Europe, and an Eastern h istory centered around China. Instead, it was composed of a Korean history that broke away from colonial views, a World history centered around exchange and trade, and an East Asian history that emphasizes the relationship between Korea, Japan, and China.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-090929337