인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This paper aims to examine how Korean EFL learners use unless-clauses in terms of their position and boundness related to main clauses. Based on Chafe (1984), unless-clauses are divided into four types: Type A (preposed bound), Type B (postposed bound), Type C (preposed free), and Type D (postposed free). The previous studies have shown that English native speakers tend to postpose unless-clauses and that Type B is the most typical unless-clauses. In this study, 93 unless-clauses in 57 college students’ English writings were analysed based on the four types. The results showed that 61 unless-clauses (65.59%) are used as Type C and that 25 unless-clauses (26.88%) are used as Type B. Native speakers used 66(66%) Type B unless-clauses in written English in Park (2020). This result may represent that L1 transfer had effects on learners’ use of unless-clauses because conditional clauses precede main clauses in Korean. Based on the results, this study suggests that it is required to teach the use of Type B (postposed bound) unless-clauses for Korean EFL learners.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091115391
