인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
초록·키워드
In this paper, based on the study of social narrative and social narratology, I studied Arthur W. Frank’s theory of socio-narratology and his personal illness narrative and his analysis of general illness narratives. Social narratives have common characteristics and criteria with literary narrative as a narrative itself, but it also has different characteristics from literary narrative in that it is a real narrative of reality, not a fictional narrative of literary art. From this perspective, narratology requires not only literary narratology but also social narratology. In this study, I dealt with the characteristics and core of social narratology, and then studied A. Frank’s social narratology. Based on this, I studied illness narrative as a social narrative, especially A. Frank’s illness narrative.
In his theory of socio-narratology, A. Frank emphasized the social relationality and polyphony of social narrative, claiming that narrative not only reflects experience but also creates experience. He also emphasized dialogical narrative analysis as the practice of socio-narratology theory. From this perspective of social narrative, he narrated the story of his own illness experience as a social narrative and explored others’ illness narratives on the layer of textuality. He emphasized that his own illness narrative can play an important role as a social narrative and communicated his own illness experience well as a social narrative. He also divided people’s illness narrative types into restitution narrative, chaos narrative, and quest narrative and suggested additional possibilities for life-as-normal narrative.
In his theory of socio-narratology, A. Frank emphasized the social relationality and polyphony of social narrative, claiming that narrative not only reflects experience but also creates experience. He also emphasized dialogical narrative analysis as the practice of socio-narratology theory. From this perspective of social narrative, he narrated the story of his own illness experience as a social narrative and explored others’ illness narratives on the layer of textuality. He emphasized that his own illness narrative can play an important role as a social narrative and communicated his own illness experience well as a social narrative. He also divided people’s illness narrative types into restitution narrative, chaos narrative, and quest narrative and suggested additional possibilities for life-as-normal narrative.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091266991