인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 10%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
Indirect employment has been prevalent in the workplace for a long time. Labor law scholars have continued to argue that third parties (primary contractors, etc.) who actually control and determine working conditions of indirectly employed workers should assume employer responsibility under the Labor Union Act in order to improve the labor conditions of indirectly employed workers.
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled third parties(primary contractors) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act and also ruled unfair labor practices through control or intervention(Hyundai Heavy Industries case). Meanwhile, there was a recent case where the National Labor Relations Commission and the court recognized third parties(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act in an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(in 2021-2024, a representative case is the CJ Express case). And the Supreme Court's full bench is currently reviewing an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(another Hyundai Heavy Industries case).
While anticipating a Supreme Court's full bench ruling that recognizes employer responsibility under the Labor Union Act for third parties who actually control and determine the labor conditions of indirectly employed workers, this article focuses on two issues.
First, through recent cases where a third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control was recognized as an employer under the Labor Union Act, this is a review of the specific criteria for determining actual control in relation to collective bargaining matters when indirectly employed workers and the third party engage in collective bargaining.
Second, through the interpretation of the Constitution and the Labor Union Act, this is a review of what the objects of collective bargaining is subject to collective bargaining obligations by the third party with actual control, how the objects of collective bargaining should be distributed between the third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control and the direct employer, and whether collective bargaining can be conducted independently.
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled third parties(primary contractors) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act and also ruled unfair labor practices through control or intervention(Hyundai Heavy Industries case). Meanwhile, there was a recent case where the National Labor Relations Commission and the court recognized third parties(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control as employers under the Labor Union Act in an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(in 2021-2024, a representative case is the CJ Express case). And the Supreme Court's full bench is currently reviewing an unfair labor practice case of refusal to collective bargaining(another Hyundai Heavy Industries case).
While anticipating a Supreme Court's full bench ruling that recognizes employer responsibility under the Labor Union Act for third parties who actually control and determine the labor conditions of indirectly employed workers, this article focuses on two issues.
First, through recent cases where a third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control was recognized as an employer under the Labor Union Act, this is a review of the specific criteria for determining actual control in relation to collective bargaining matters when indirectly employed workers and the third party engage in collective bargaining.
Second, through the interpretation of the Constitution and the Labor Union Act, this is a review of what the objects of collective bargaining is subject to collective bargaining obligations by the third party with actual control, how the objects of collective bargaining should be distributed between the third party(primary contractors, etc.) with actual control and the direct employer, and whether collective bargaining can be conducted independently.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092101793