인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
On August 29, 2024, the Constitutional Court of Korea issued a decision of nonconformity regarding Article 8, Paragraph 1 of the Carbon Neutrality Act, mandating a quantitative specification of the emissions pathway between the 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution and the 2050 net-zero target. This ruling is expected to stimulate extensive academic and policy discussions on the necessary pathway. While the exact shape of the emissions pathway may vary according to philosophical approach, three primary forms can be considered: concave, linear, and convex. This study employs optimal control theory to clarify the form and characteristics of an optimal emissions pathway. Cost minimization is the preferred criterion, acknowledging that the optimal pathway may differ depending on the selected criterion. The resulting emissions pathway is convex and downward-sloping, indicating that greenhouse gas reductions should be implemented as early as feasible. The pace of reduction is dependent on the relative magnitude of the social cost of carbon and mitigation costs: a larger social cost of carbon results in a more pronounced convex emissions pathway. Determining the exact shape of the optimal emissions path requires knowledge of the values of both the social cost of carbon and mitigation costs, which are still subjects of ongoing debate. Consequently, this study suggests that the government should establish a plausible range for these two costs, rather than seeking scientifically exact values, to determine the emissions path for the period 2031 ~ 2049.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092171240
