인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 5%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
This study aims to examine students’ responses to information generated by ChatGPT, based on the premise that examining fundamental nature and characteristics of the technology is a prerequisite to its effective utilization.
To this end, this study first identified the characteristics of historical information generated by ChatGPT. The historical information produced by ChatGPT is not presented as fragmented data, but as a well-structured narratives or writings resulting from searching and processing materials. It also bears similarities to the historical information encountered by students in that it includes multiple layers of false information created by AI hallucinations. However, ChatGPT-generated information differs from conventional historical information in that it does not provide sources and lacks the intervention of an author’s intent.
Subsequently, documents containing historical information were generated using ChatGPT, and the types of errors in these documents were examined. Three groups were then surveyed to understand how they perceived and responded to the false information in the ChatGPT-generated document.
As a result, it was confirmed that knowing historical facts, including the process of knowledge construction, is important and that lessons need to shift toward fostering critical thinking and a questioning mindset.
Based on these findings, it was concluded that in order to use ChatGPT in classroom instructions effectively, it is necessary to provide guidance on the technology’s limitations and potential errors, combine historical facts with a critical perspective, verify the process of constructing historical facts and knowledge within generated information, and examine the context and logical structure of the writing. Additionally, this study suggested a broad outline of an approach for utilizing ChatGPT in history classes.
To this end, this study first identified the characteristics of historical information generated by ChatGPT. The historical information produced by ChatGPT is not presented as fragmented data, but as a well-structured narratives or writings resulting from searching and processing materials. It also bears similarities to the historical information encountered by students in that it includes multiple layers of false information created by AI hallucinations. However, ChatGPT-generated information differs from conventional historical information in that it does not provide sources and lacks the intervention of an author’s intent.
Subsequently, documents containing historical information were generated using ChatGPT, and the types of errors in these documents were examined. Three groups were then surveyed to understand how they perceived and responded to the false information in the ChatGPT-generated document.
As a result, it was confirmed that knowing historical facts, including the process of knowledge construction, is important and that lessons need to shift toward fostering critical thinking and a questioning mindset.
Based on these findings, it was concluded that in order to use ChatGPT in classroom instructions effectively, it is necessary to provide guidance on the technology’s limitations and potential errors, combine historical facts with a critical perspective, verify the process of constructing historical facts and knowledge within generated information, and examine the context and logical structure of the writing. Additionally, this study suggested a broad outline of an approach for utilizing ChatGPT in history classes.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092099645