인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The expansion of the Japanese empire since the late nineteenth century paralleled the nation’s modernization. In this context, the historical research on Korea conducted by Japanese historians since the late nineteenth century until 1945 served a dual purpose: on the one hand, it supported Japan’s colonial expansion; on the other, it established historical studies as a modern discipline, which entailed the creation of Tōyō (Japan’s Orient).
While previous studies on Japanese historiography during that period tended to focus on its function as a tool for supporting Japanese colonialism, they have not paid due attention to its formation as a part of Tōyō (東洋). This paper examines how the Japanese historians conceptualized the notion of Tōyō and the position of Korea within this historical space, through focusing on Inaba Iwakichi(稻葉岩吉)’s work on Korean political history. His study was based on the explanations of Chinese history by his teacher Naitō Konan (內藤湖南). Naitō, a professor of history at Kyōtō Imperial University, explained the Tang-Song transition (唐宋變革) as the evolution from medieval aristocracy to early modern monarchy. Building on this argument, Inaba interpreted that the political system of the Joseon dynasty remained at the stage of aristocracy, emphasizing the familialism that Koreans clung to throughout the Joseon dynasty. Inaba’s research suggests that the theory of stagnation extended beyond the studies on Korean economic history. Moreover, it also shows that Japanese historians positioned Korea as the most backward entity within Tōyō, which mainly consists of Korea, China, and Japan.
While previous studies on Japanese historiography during that period tended to focus on its function as a tool for supporting Japanese colonialism, they have not paid due attention to its formation as a part of Tōyō (東洋). This paper examines how the Japanese historians conceptualized the notion of Tōyō and the position of Korea within this historical space, through focusing on Inaba Iwakichi(稻葉岩吉)’s work on Korean political history. His study was based on the explanations of Chinese history by his teacher Naitō Konan (內藤湖南). Naitō, a professor of history at Kyōtō Imperial University, explained the Tang-Song transition (唐宋變革) as the evolution from medieval aristocracy to early modern monarchy. Building on this argument, Inaba interpreted that the political system of the Joseon dynasty remained at the stage of aristocracy, emphasizing the familialism that Koreans clung to throughout the Joseon dynasty. Inaba’s research suggests that the theory of stagnation extended beyond the studies on Korean economic history. Moreover, it also shows that Japanese historians positioned Korea as the most backward entity within Tōyō, which mainly consists of Korea, China, and Japan.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092099654
