인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 10%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
The sharecropping system was divided into To-Ji (賭地) and Byung-Jak. While To-Ji was analyzed as a pure lease, Byung-Jak was interpreted as not being a pure lease because it involved joint cultivation and a sharing relationship. However, the Japanese government classified not only To-Ji but also Byung-Jak as leases, so the meaning of Byung-Jak converged with that of Ta-Jo (打租, fixed-rate sharecropping). Yet, as landowners had no choice but to be utilized for agricultural improvements and land development, remnants of joint cultivation and sharing relationships were left in practice. As a result, not only Byung-Jak but also To-Ji were affected by these remnants. The 1900s saw the emergence of company landowners. The Japanese government acknowledged the existence of the custom of foundation corporations, but did not recognize the custom of corporations. By the end of 1910, the Japanese government had completed land surveys in Bucheon-gun, Gimpo-gun, and Siheung-gun. Although the Korea Development Company (Chosun Development Company) and Hansung Bank reported land ownership, they were not recognized as legal entities under the application of existing customs or laws. The Japanese government enacted the Company Ordinance in 1910, which came into effect in 1911. With the recognition of corporations by the Japanese government, company landowners were authorized as corporate landowners. As they expanded the scale of their landholdings, they led not only agricultural improvements but also land development. They managed and guided tenant farmers regardless of the type of sharecropping system.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092139215