인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This paper analyzes ‘管+personal pronoun’. ‘irony’ from a discourse cognitive perspective. ‘管+他(=不管)’, which is the opposition between the surface meaning and the underlying meaning, is irony. Unlike Korean or English, ‘管+他’ in modern Chinese realizes ‘linguistic irony’ in terms of syntactic structure. However, in order to understand the subjectivity of the speaker’s attitude, position, and emotion, ‘situational irony’ must also be considered. Since irony appears only when there is a presupposed utterance situation, ‘管+他’ is always located in the center or conclusion of a conversation. In order to concretize the views of Chinese scholars who regard ‘管+他’ as a ‘discourse marker’ created by grammaticalization, this paper conducted its research by tracing the five contents covered in ‘The Process of Change in Subjectivation’ by Traugott(1995).
‘管’ and ‘他’ have strong ‘bondedness’ and function as ‘clitization’, a ‘grammatical binding device’ in the text, to bind various parts of the entire discourse. In addition, they gradually become abstract and pragmatic and function as a speaker-centered function. As the situation is viewed from an egocentric perspective, the text gradually changes into a subjective meaning and the speaker as the subject. In other words, it means that the situation and the speaker are closely related. The most interesting point in this paper is the content on ‘epistemic modality’ and ‘figure’ and ‘ground’. Based on pragmatic premises, ‘epistemic modality’ related to deduction and inference was studied. As a result of studying three contents in total for deductive argument, ‘grounds, therefore conclusion’, ‘conclusion, because grounds’, and ‘grounds(reasons)’, it was found that in deductive argument, since the speaker takes the lead in the premise, the speaker’s intention is the most important, and no matter how wrong the argument is, in deductive argument, only ‘unfairness’ or ‘unsoundness’ exist, and all deductive arguments are acceptable. It is also interesting that novelists use the expression ‘管+他’ to induce the reader to ‘perceptual act’ referred to as ‘foreground’ and ‘background’.
‘管’ and ‘他’ have strong ‘bondedness’ and function as ‘clitization’, a ‘grammatical binding device’ in the text, to bind various parts of the entire discourse. In addition, they gradually become abstract and pragmatic and function as a speaker-centered function. As the situation is viewed from an egocentric perspective, the text gradually changes into a subjective meaning and the speaker as the subject. In other words, it means that the situation and the speaker are closely related. The most interesting point in this paper is the content on ‘epistemic modality’ and ‘figure’ and ‘ground’. Based on pragmatic premises, ‘epistemic modality’ related to deduction and inference was studied. As a result of studying three contents in total for deductive argument, ‘grounds, therefore conclusion’, ‘conclusion, because grounds’, and ‘grounds(reasons)’, it was found that in deductive argument, since the speaker takes the lead in the premise, the speaker’s intention is the most important, and no matter how wrong the argument is, in deductive argument, only ‘unfairness’ or ‘unsoundness’ exist, and all deductive arguments are acceptable. It is also interesting that novelists use the expression ‘管+他’ to induce the reader to ‘perceptual act’ referred to as ‘foreground’ and ‘background’.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092246751