인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
As the prevalence of partial tooth loss in elderly patients increases, accurate RPD frameworks becomes crucial for comfort and oral health. This study compared the dimensional accuracy of RPD frameworks fabricated at various build angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) using Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology. The samples were made from CoCr28Mo6 alloy powder.
The accuracy of each framework was evaluated using root mean square (RMS) values and color deviation maps. The results showed that as the build angle increased, the accuracy decreased, especially in critical areas like clasps. One-way ANOVA analysis revealed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.001), with Tukey’s post-hoc tests indicating substantial discrepancies between build angles greater than 15°. These findings demonstrate that the build angle in AM significantly affects the precision of RPD frameworks, highlighting the need for optimized angle selection in clinical applications.
The accuracy of each framework was evaluated using root mean square (RMS) values and color deviation maps. The results showed that as the build angle increased, the accuracy decreased, especially in critical areas like clasps. One-way ANOVA analysis revealed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.001), with Tukey’s post-hoc tests indicating substantial discrepancies between build angles greater than 15°. These findings demonstrate that the build angle in AM significantly affects the precision of RPD frameworks, highlighting the need for optimized angle selection in clinical applications.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092306832
