인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This paper examines the impact of Ancient Near East legal tradition on the interior society and the regions exterior based on the Old Babylonian and Neo Babylonian Document.
First, the central power of legal authority was the king. Among the laws of the king, only selected laws were entered into the code of the king. The local region had, autonomy over legal reglement and administrative rules. However, if the king wanted to enforce his own law, he could replace local law with his law. Further an individual could request the king to apply the king’s law in any particular case. Therefore, the legal tradition of the Ancient Near East could be practiced two directions as per the central power of the king or according local power.
This legal tradition of the Ancient Near East has an impact on local regions away from the king’s central geographical area. This impact can be verified in a document of the Syro-Palestine region. The legal tradition of central Ancient Near East could be found in scholarly documents of the Canaan region during the Bronze Age. Biblical law partially followed the legal tradition of central Ancient Near East and partially adopted a different tradition. It means that in this region, legal ancient tradition was accepted selectively.
In conclusion, the legal tradition of Ancient Near East did not have a forceful impact on the interior and exterior regions of the Ancient Near East. In the interior regions, it was two directional, and in the exterior regions, it was accepted selectively.
First, the central power of legal authority was the king. Among the laws of the king, only selected laws were entered into the code of the king. The local region had, autonomy over legal reglement and administrative rules. However, if the king wanted to enforce his own law, he could replace local law with his law. Further an individual could request the king to apply the king’s law in any particular case. Therefore, the legal tradition of the Ancient Near East could be practiced two directions as per the central power of the king or according local power.
This legal tradition of the Ancient Near East has an impact on local regions away from the king’s central geographical area. This impact can be verified in a document of the Syro-Palestine region. The legal tradition of central Ancient Near East could be found in scholarly documents of the Canaan region during the Bronze Age. Biblical law partially followed the legal tradition of central Ancient Near East and partially adopted a different tradition. It means that in this region, legal ancient tradition was accepted selectively.
In conclusion, the legal tradition of Ancient Near East did not have a forceful impact on the interior and exterior regions of the Ancient Near East. In the interior regions, it was two directional, and in the exterior regions, it was accepted selectively.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092332636
