인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This article summarizes the issues in researches on Confucian Universalism(中華), examines the contributions of the recently published books, and suggests future challenges for advancing researches on Confucian Universalism based on these findings.
There has been an increase in the number of studies that look at Confucian Universalism as a sense of mission on their times and belief system of Joseon’s intellectuals. However, a fundamental criticism of this trend was consistently raised: that the idea of Confucian Universalism was a grandiose, ideological fiction and a tool of the ruling class. Although various studies have raised various contexts of Confucian Universalism, the issues surrounding Confucian Universalism remain unresolved.
Both “Chunghwa: the Criteria of a Lost Civilization” and “The Relationship between Joseon·Qing Dynasty and the Diplomacy of Embassy” shared a common emphasis on historical context and attempted to answer the questions that had been raised in their own ways. While both books have helped to resolve some of the questions that have been raised in approaching the Confucian Universalism, they also leave some challenges. This article is organized the challenges into three categories: the synthesis of varuous research trends of Confucian Universalism, the exploring research of Confucian Universalism beyond Joseon, and the debates about historical significance of Confucian Universalism. In particular, this article suggested discussion points related to historical context and the meaning of Confucian Universalism.
There has been an increase in the number of studies that look at Confucian Universalism as a sense of mission on their times and belief system of Joseon’s intellectuals. However, a fundamental criticism of this trend was consistently raised: that the idea of Confucian Universalism was a grandiose, ideological fiction and a tool of the ruling class. Although various studies have raised various contexts of Confucian Universalism, the issues surrounding Confucian Universalism remain unresolved.
Both “Chunghwa: the Criteria of a Lost Civilization” and “The Relationship between Joseon·Qing Dynasty and the Diplomacy of Embassy” shared a common emphasis on historical context and attempted to answer the questions that had been raised in their own ways. While both books have helped to resolve some of the questions that have been raised in approaching the Confucian Universalism, they also leave some challenges. This article is organized the challenges into three categories: the synthesis of varuous research trends of Confucian Universalism, the exploring research of Confucian Universalism beyond Joseon, and the debates about historical significance of Confucian Universalism. In particular, this article suggested discussion points related to historical context and the meaning of Confucian Universalism.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092332645
