인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 0.5%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
This paper analyzes the history and legal nature of martial law in the early Republic of Korea, focusing on how state violence was institutionalized and legally justified in the absence of formal martial law statutes. In particular, it examines the historical and legal essence of martial law against the backdrop of the failed attempt at a self-coup following the declaration of emergency martial law on December 3, 2024, which has sparked active debates on the unconstitutionality and illegality of martial law and emergency powers. The study begins with an analysis of martial law during the U.S. military government’s 1946 ‘October Uprising’, the ‘Yeosu-Suncheon Incident’, and the ‘Jeju 4·3 Incident’, exploring the process through which martial law legislation emerged and its legal and political implications. Additionally, it investigates the interaction between presidential emergency orders and martial law during the Korean War, shedding light on how emergency powers facilitated large-scale civilian massacres and internal violence.
This paper argues that martial law was not merely an emergency measure but a tool for legally legitimizing and institutionalizing state violence. Using the December 3 emergency martial law declaration as a reference point, it highlights the need for legal and institutional reforms to address the fundamental flaws of emergency powers. Finally, the study reflects on the historical lessons of martial law and state violence while exploring pathways toward a system that upholds democracy and human rights.
This paper argues that martial law was not merely an emergency measure but a tool for legally legitimizing and institutionalizing state violence. Using the December 3 emergency martial law declaration as a reference point, it highlights the need for legal and institutional reforms to address the fundamental flaws of emergency powers. Finally, the study reflects on the historical lessons of martial law and state violence while exploring pathways toward a system that upholds democracy and human rights.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092449823
