메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(국립창원대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2025년 봄호(통권 제150호)
오류 신고하기

피인용 2

검색

    초록·키워드

    According to Schmitt’s theory, the declaration of martial law in 2024 was an act of determining a state of exception and it expresses the will of the president of the Republic, the representative of sovereignty, to become a sovereign by himself. From the perspective of martial law executors, the night of December 3 was a state of exception that deviated from the legal order by the will and commands of the Supreme ruler. Declaring this exception, the new sovereign continued the tradition of monarchical sovereignty, established in the Absolute Monarchy. This situation temporarily created a dual power, where the people who had sovereignty competed with the new sovereign from the exception. This was a theoretical proxy war between Bodin and Rousseau. How to evaluate and recognize historically the legitimacy of the locus of sovereignty? Through a critical review of Schmitt’s theory and the logic behind the punishment of Louis XVI during the French Revolution, we will answer this question.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092458662