인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This study addresses the need to validate Munsell's color harmony theory, a widely utilized framework in color combination strategies. It aims to assess the effectiveness of Munsell's theory through evaluations of harmony and preference and to investigate the influence of contextual application on these evaluations. Three types of color combinations derived from Munsell's theory (monochromatic, analogous, and complementary) were compared to designer-proposed color combinations. Participants assessed the harmony and preference of these combinations using a 7-point Likert scale across three stimulus formats: color strips, 2D patterns, and 3D spatial stimuli. The mean scores of harmony and preference evaluations were statistically analyzed and compared. The perceived harmony of Munsell's color harmony theory varied by combination type. Monochromatic and analogous combinations were consistently rated as harmonious across all stimulus formats, while complementary combinations received negative evaluations. Furthermore, the type of stimulus influenced the perception of harmony, with notable variations in evaluations of the same color combinations across different stimulus formats. The findings indicate that not all aspects of Munsell's color harmony theory are universally perceived as harmonious, underscoring the need for caution when utilizing complementary color combinations. Additionally, the study highlights the significant role of application context in shaping evaluations of color combinations, advocating for the careful consideration of contextual factors in the color design.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092458331
