인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This article explores the historical evolution of Yanlun (言論) during the Ming and Qing dynasties. In early modern Chinese society, Yanlun carried a specific political connotation. During the Ming dynasty, the censorial system expanded nationwide, and circuit censors were responsible not only for overseeing judicial and administrative matters but also for evaluating the local officials. Amidst this trend, the mid-Ming period witnessed a significant expansion of channels for public discourse (Yanlu, 言路).
Under Qing rule, the Yanlu, which had flourished just a century earlier and served as a bridge between central and local society, came to an almost complete halt. The role of circuit censors (巡按御史) in relaying public discourse was abolished, and the system of transmitting information through public opinion channels was replaced by the new Memorials (Zouzhe, 奏摺), which established direct communication between the Emperor and provincial high officials. From the perspective of power and communication, the Ming and Qing dynasties present a stark contrast, to the extent that each could serve as a cautionary example for the other. The state’s monopoly over communication methods in this way is believed to have influenced the Qing dynasty’s response strategies during the late 18th century when it faced rapidly escalating crises.
Under Qing rule, the Yanlu, which had flourished just a century earlier and served as a bridge between central and local society, came to an almost complete halt. The role of circuit censors (巡按御史) in relaying public discourse was abolished, and the system of transmitting information through public opinion channels was replaced by the new Memorials (Zouzhe, 奏摺), which established direct communication between the Emperor and provincial high officials. From the perspective of power and communication, the Ming and Qing dynasties present a stark contrast, to the extent that each could serve as a cautionary example for the other. The state’s monopoly over communication methods in this way is believed to have influenced the Qing dynasty’s response strategies during the late 18th century when it faced rapidly escalating crises.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092710872
