인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The Canberra Conference holds significant implications for the postwar diplomatic order in East Asia.
First, it served as a precursor to the 1951 San Francisco Peace Conference, laying the groundwork for many of the discussions that followed.
Second, the conference brought together representatives of the United Kingdom, the four major Commonwealth dominions―Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa―as well as India, Pakistan, and Burma, all of which had recently achieved independence from Britain. Their participation reflected the shifting composition and priorities of the postwar Commonwealth.
Third, the Canberra Conference addressed nearly all of the key agendas and topics that would later emerge in the Japanese Peace Treaty, from the vantage point of 1947.
Fourth, the conference marked the collapse of the early U.S.-led peace plan of 1947, and brought to the surface clear positions from the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, the United States, the Soviet Union, and China regarding the Japan Peace Treaty.
Sixth, and most notably for Korea, the Canberra Conference unexpectedly raised the question of sovereignty over Jeju Island. Amid concerns that Korea might fall to communism, the British Foreign Office identified Jeju as Japanese territory in a draft of the 1951 peace treaty. This position was not incidental―it reflected a hardline British stance that excluded Korea from participating in the peace conference and ultimately undermined Korean claims and interests in the final San Francisco Treaty.
First, it served as a precursor to the 1951 San Francisco Peace Conference, laying the groundwork for many of the discussions that followed.
Second, the conference brought together representatives of the United Kingdom, the four major Commonwealth dominions―Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa―as well as India, Pakistan, and Burma, all of which had recently achieved independence from Britain. Their participation reflected the shifting composition and priorities of the postwar Commonwealth.
Third, the Canberra Conference addressed nearly all of the key agendas and topics that would later emerge in the Japanese Peace Treaty, from the vantage point of 1947.
Fourth, the conference marked the collapse of the early U.S.-led peace plan of 1947, and brought to the surface clear positions from the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, the United States, the Soviet Union, and China regarding the Japan Peace Treaty.
Sixth, and most notably for Korea, the Canberra Conference unexpectedly raised the question of sovereignty over Jeju Island. Amid concerns that Korea might fall to communism, the British Foreign Office identified Jeju as Japanese territory in a draft of the 1951 peace treaty. This position was not incidental―it reflected a hardline British stance that excluded Korea from participating in the peace conference and ultimately undermined Korean claims and interests in the final San Francisco Treaty.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-093088913
