인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This paper examines the challenges to the traditional concept of ‘employer’ posed by the diversification of employment forms and the rise of platform work under Korea’s Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). It highlights the phenomenon of fragmented employment and dispersed employer responsibilities in multi-employer relationships and notes that, currently, Korean law primarily addresses these issues through regulations focused on contractors and limited provisions for special-type and delivery workers. However, the law does not adequately address the issue of dispersed employer responsibility. To address this issue, the paper analyses overseas case studies, including Australia’s Model Work Health and Safety Act (Model WHS Act), the EU Platform Work Directive and the US Multi-Employer Citation Policy. The Australian legislation introduces the concept of a PCBU (Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking), enabling multiple business operators to share occupational health and safety duties and enhancing the effectiveness of these responsibilities in new employment relationships such as platform work. The EU directive emphasises the need for risk assessment, preventive measures, transparency in algorithm management and protection against violence and harassment in platform work. The US policy functionally classifies employer responsibilities at multiemployer work sites, thereby clarifying accountability in fragmented employment structures. The paper concludes that Korea’s OSHA should be reformed to enable multiple and joint employer responsibilities for occupational safety and health, drawing on these international legislative models.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-093628873