인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 5%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
The purpose of study is to explore and compare the development trends and educational implications of artificial intelligence AI literacy education in China and South Korea. This study poses the following research question: How do South Korea and China differ in their strategic approaches to AI literacy, and what mutual insights can be drawn to improve educational policies and practices? Answer this question, a systematic literature review SLR was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, reviewing 36 empirical studies published between 2018 and April 2025. A SWOT–PEST analysis framework was employed to examine the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats from political, economic, social, and technological perspectives. The findings reveal that China emphasizes centralized policymaking, university-level AI integration, and large-scale teacher training, while South Korea focuses on ethical AI education, curriculum integration, and practical implementation in primary and secondary education. Both countries demonstrate strong strategic planning but face similar challenges, including regional disparities, insufficient teacher competencies, and a lack of standardized evaluation systems. The study concludes that it is essential to establish lifelong AI literacy curricula, enhance teacher training programs, develop national evaluation frameworks, reduce digital equity gaps, and promote international cooperation. These recommendations are intended to support the sustainable and equitable growth of AI literacy education in both contexts.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-093946134