메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(경북대학교) (경북대학교)
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제114집
오류 신고하기

피인용 1

검색

    초록·키워드

    This study compares the feedback profiles produced by ChatGPT and Gemini on the same undergraduate persuasive-writing task under an identical prompt. Using an RTPR-based LLM-as-a-Judge framework with counter-balancing, we tested seven rubric criteria and the overall mean via independent two-sample t-tests. Significant differences emerged for most criteria and for the overall mean (p<.001); Lexical Accuracy favored ChatGPT over Gemini (p=.017), whereas Sentence Clarity was not significant (p=.084). These findings indicate systematic, model-specific strengths and weaknesses even under identical inputs, suggesting instructionally targeted model choice (e.g., argument/evidence/organization vs. lexical refinement). The study was limited to two models and a single genre; no multiple-comparison correction was applied.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094310768