인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) approaches have recently gained traction for their mitigation potential to contribute to achieving carbon neutrality. Numerous policy options have been proposed to facilitate the demonstration and deployment of CDR approaches. Integration of CDR approaches into the emission trading system (ETS) is one such essential policy. While major global jurisdictions are actively exploring the integration of CDR approaches, including engineering-based CDR approaches, into their ETS, the Korean ETS (K-ETS) currently includes only afforestation & reforestation, which is one of the nature-based CDR approaches, as eligible mitigation options. In this regard, it is an opportune time to consider the integration of other CDR approaches into the K-ETS as eligible mitigation activities. Accordingly, this study explores two research questions. First, it conducts research on the integration of CDR approaches into ETS in other regions. The study then explores the most appropriate policy approaches to the integration of CDR approaches into the K-ETS, drawing on the results of the Delphi survey among experts. For this, four questionnaires were prepared: one each to query i) the necessity of K-ETS institutional improvement, ii) CDR approaches to be prioritized for integration into the K-ETS, iii) policies to consider CDR approaches, particularly engineering-based CDR approaches, in the K-ETS, and iv) values to be prioritized. The survey results reveal Korea’s future policy path for the integration of CDR approaches into the K-ETS.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094529641
