인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This article traces how the Treaty of Shimonoseki was narrated and interpreted in late Qing China. It focuses on the emergence of the modern discourse of “national humiliation” (guochi 國恥) in response to the shifting demands of the era. Immediately after the treaty’s signing, officials and literati opposed its ratification on grounds of dynastic legitimacy and territorial integrity, while also developing self-reflective critiques that located the causes of defeat within the regime itself. Newspapers such as Shen Bao and Xinwen Bao brought the issue into the public sphere, fueling popular anger while debating pragmatic alternatives, including whether it was less costly to cede territory or to pay indemnities. Intellectuals, represented by statecraft anthologies like the Huangchao Jingshi Wenxinbian Xuji, used the treaty as an analytical lens to diagnose systemic collapse and to argue for fundamental institutional reform.
Building on these debates, the New Policies period of the 1900s saw textbooks selectively reconstruct these diverse responses, consolidating them into a singular narrative of “national humiliation” for the next generation. This process employed strategies such as presenting seemingly objective facts stripped of emotion and drawing a sharp contrast between “us” and “the enemy.” The institutionalization of a complex and multifaceted sense of humiliation into an educational “history” demonstrates how the modern nation-state shapes and mobilizes collective memory. This new consciousness of recording provided a crucial foundation for the later construction of the “Century of Humiliation” (Bainian Guochi 百年國恥) narrative that continues to inform modern Chinese historical identity.
Building on these debates, the New Policies period of the 1900s saw textbooks selectively reconstruct these diverse responses, consolidating them into a singular narrative of “national humiliation” for the next generation. This process employed strategies such as presenting seemingly objective facts stripped of emotion and drawing a sharp contrast between “us” and “the enemy.” The institutionalization of a complex and multifaceted sense of humiliation into an educational “history” demonstrates how the modern nation-state shapes and mobilizes collective memory. This new consciousness of recording provided a crucial foundation for the later construction of the “Century of Humiliation” (Bainian Guochi 百年國恥) narrative that continues to inform modern Chinese historical identity.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094529561
