인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The present study investigates Sima Qian(司马迁)’s narrative strategy in portraying the rebellion of Han Xin(韩信) in the Huiyinhouliezhuan(淮阴侯列传), with the aim of elucidating Sima Qian’s evaluation of the event. Through close textual analysis, this paper identifies three salient features in Sima Qian’s account. First, in the Huiyinhouliezhuan, an opposition is constructed between Han Xin’s loyalty and trust, and Liu Bang(刘邦)’s distrust and deception.In this process, the shape of Han Xin’s loyalty and trust is becoming more prominent, resulting in weakening the possibility of Han Xin’s rebellion. Second, in the Huiyinhouliezhuan, the achievements of Han Xin and the persuasive arguments of Wu She(武涉) and Kuai Tong(蒯通) are described in great length and detail. The former emphasizes the enormous achievements Han Xin had accomplished, while the latter implies that when one’s achievements become too great, one’s life inevitably falls into danger. Together, they form a proportional relationship: the greater Han Xin’s achievements, the higher the risk of his being put to death. This suggests that Han Xin’s execution was not the result of rebellion, but rather something destined by fate, thereby revealing that the cause of his death lay not in treason but in inevitability. Finally, in the Huiyinhouliezhuan, the motives, background, and plans of Han Xin’s alleged rebellion are inconsistent, lack close coherence, and at times even contradict one another. This suggests that the account may have been deliberately written in such a way as to cast doubt on the credibility of the rebellion itself.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094516019
