인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the shot selection and scoring patterns among para-badminton players classified as WH1 and WH2.
Method: Thirty matches (15 from each classification) from national competitions hosted by the Korea Para-Badminton Association were analyzed. Data regarding shot types, shot locations, and scoring and conceding patterns were extracted using the Dartfish program. Descriptive analyses and the Mann–Whitney U test were performed to identify differences between the two classification (WH1 vs. WH2).
Results: The most commonly used shot was the clear, with WH2 players using the drop shot more frequently than WH1 players. WH1 players scored more points from the right and left sides of the mid-zone, whereas WH2 players scored more points from the center and left sides of the front zone. WH1 players scored more points from clears but conceded more points from drives and clears. Conversely, WH2 players conceded more points from drop and lob shots. Additionally, WH1 players scored more points on the right and center of the midfield but conceded more points on the right and left sides of the midfield. WH2 players conceded more points on the right side of the backfield.
Conclusion: These findings will help players and coaches in developing effective training and match strategies.
Method: Thirty matches (15 from each classification) from national competitions hosted by the Korea Para-Badminton Association were analyzed. Data regarding shot types, shot locations, and scoring and conceding patterns were extracted using the Dartfish program. Descriptive analyses and the Mann–Whitney U test were performed to identify differences between the two classification (WH1 vs. WH2).
Results: The most commonly used shot was the clear, with WH2 players using the drop shot more frequently than WH1 players. WH1 players scored more points from the right and left sides of the mid-zone, whereas WH2 players scored more points from the center and left sides of the front zone. WH1 players scored more points from clears but conceded more points from drives and clears. Conversely, WH2 players conceded more points from drop and lob shots. Additionally, WH1 players scored more points on the right and center of the midfield but conceded more points on the right and left sides of the midfield. WH2 players conceded more points on the right side of the backfield.
Conclusion: These findings will help players and coaches in developing effective training and match strategies.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094478872
