인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the necessity of hip joint exercise for patients with chronic low back pain by comparing the effects of hip joint exercise (HJE) and lumbar joint exercise (LJE) on pain, static balance, and dynamic balance.
Method: Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned to an HJE (n=12) and LJE (n=12) groups. Both groups trained three times per week, with each session lasting 40 minutes, over an eight-week period. Pain and disability were measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Korean Oswestry Disability Index (KODI). Static balance was evaluated using the One-Leg Standing Balance (OLSB) test, while dynamic balance was measured with the Y-Balance Test (YBT). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-tests, with statistical significance set at α=.05.
Results: Both groups showed significant decreases in VAS and KODI scores after training, with no significant differences between groups. OLSB significantly improved in the left leg of the HJE group compared to the LJE group ( p<.05). YBT scores increased in both groups. The HJE group showed greater gains in anterior ( p<.001) and composite score ( p<.01). Posterior-lateral and posterior-medial significantly improved in both groups ( p<.05), with no significant differences between groups.
Conclusion: Both HJE and LJE reduced pain and improved balance. HJE was more effective than LJE in improving anterior and overall dynamic balance. These results suggest that HJE can be a useful strategy to enhance stability and prevent falls in patients with chronic low back pain.
Method: Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned to an HJE (n=12) and LJE (n=12) groups. Both groups trained three times per week, with each session lasting 40 minutes, over an eight-week period. Pain and disability were measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Korean Oswestry Disability Index (KODI). Static balance was evaluated using the One-Leg Standing Balance (OLSB) test, while dynamic balance was measured with the Y-Balance Test (YBT). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-tests, with statistical significance set at α=.05.
Results: Both groups showed significant decreases in VAS and KODI scores after training, with no significant differences between groups. OLSB significantly improved in the left leg of the HJE group compared to the LJE group ( p<.05). YBT scores increased in both groups. The HJE group showed greater gains in anterior ( p<.001) and composite score ( p<.01). Posterior-lateral and posterior-medial significantly improved in both groups ( p<.05), with no significant differences between groups.
Conclusion: Both HJE and LJE reduced pain and improved balance. HJE was more effective than LJE in improving anterior and overall dynamic balance. These results suggest that HJE can be a useful strategy to enhance stability and prevent falls in patients with chronic low back pain.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094476341
