인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study was to develop a behaviorally anchored rating scale(BARS)-based assessment tool that can objectively and reliably evaluate university students’ debate competence, and to examine its validity and reliability. To this end, the core components of debate competence were identified through a literature review, and initial items were developed based on four major domains and fifteen sub-competencies. Subsequently, two rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted with 15 professors and instructors who had experience teaching debate-related courses, thereby securing content validity and constructing a preliminary tool. A validation survey was then administered to 211 professors and instructors. The results of an exploratory factor analysis indicated that the 15 items were structured into four factors(logical and critical reasoning skills, evidence use and information analysis skills, communication and interaction skills, and argument strategy and discussion attitude), and construct validity was confirmed. The findings suggest that this BARS-based assessment tool possesses high reliability and validity as an instrument that structurally evaluates debate competence based on behaviors observable in actual classroom settings, and that it can contribute to enhancing instructors’ assessment expertise as well as improving the quality of debate-based instruction.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094678014
