인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Purpose: This paper analyzes the relationship between Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) and Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Cost (RAM-C) from both institutional and tool-based perspectives. It explores how performance metrics for PBL can be derived and utilized through RAM-C analysis, approaching the issue conceptually by positioning PBL as the primary framework and RAM-C as a supporting analytical tool.
Methods: This study conducts a comparative analysis of Korea’s Performance-Based Logistics Regulation and the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality’s RAM-C implementation manual, alongside the U.S. military’s PBL Guidebook and RAM-C Rationale Report.
Results: The comparison reveals that the Korean system explicitly applies RAM-C as the basis for setting and evaluating PBL performance metrics and as a criterion for performance-based contracts. In particular, target values are mandated to be derived from RAM-C outputs or cost analysis results, indicating that the primary role of RAM-C in Korean PBL projects is to generate and validate performance indicators. In contrast, U.S. military documents primarily emphasize integrating RAM-C-derived design objectives into the systems engineering process, without providing detailed guidance on linking these objectives directly to PBL project execution.
Conclusion: This study presents practical considerations and methodological insights for effectively applying RAM-C to Korean PBL projects by structuring common and differentiating indicators based on the correspondence between PBL and RAM-C performance metrics.
Methods: This study conducts a comparative analysis of Korea’s Performance-Based Logistics Regulation and the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality’s RAM-C implementation manual, alongside the U.S. military’s PBL Guidebook and RAM-C Rationale Report.
Results: The comparison reveals that the Korean system explicitly applies RAM-C as the basis for setting and evaluating PBL performance metrics and as a criterion for performance-based contracts. In particular, target values are mandated to be derived from RAM-C outputs or cost analysis results, indicating that the primary role of RAM-C in Korean PBL projects is to generate and validate performance indicators. In contrast, U.S. military documents primarily emphasize integrating RAM-C-derived design objectives into the systems engineering process, without providing detailed guidance on linking these objectives directly to PBL project execution.
Conclusion: This study presents practical considerations and methodological insights for effectively applying RAM-C to Korean PBL projects by structuring common and differentiating indicators based on the correspondence between PBL and RAM-C performance metrics.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094593605
