인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
초록·키워드
This study examines methods for estimating the hazard ratio, a widely used measure for comparing risks between two groups in survival analysis, and proposes a new estimation approach to address limitations inherent in existing methods. While the Cox proportional hazards model is the standard tool for estimating hazard ratios, it assumes constant hazard rates over time (the proportional hazards assumption). However, this assumption is frequently violated in real-world survival data, often showing substantial variability at different observation periods, especially early or late in studies. Consequently, traditional methods may yield distorted hazard ratio estimates, potentially misleading interpretations regarding treatment effects. We propose a new hazard ratio estimator based on the ratio of log survival functions derived from Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Specifically, by averaging the ratio of log survival functions within the central 50% of the observation period (the 25%-75% quantile interval), our method reduces instability that often occurs at extreme time points, thus providing more stable and interpretable hazard ratio estimates. In simulations with exponential and Weibull models under the proportional hazards assumption, the interquartile range averaged estimator showed improved stability - especially with smaller samples or higher censoring - whereas at larger sample sizes (n=500) differences were negligible as all estimators converged to the true HR. Accordingly, the proposed method should be viewed as a variance-stabilized HR summary under PH, rather than a tool for handling non-proportional hazards or crossing survival curves.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-094594077