인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 10%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This study aimed to compare the effects of an 8-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program and a moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) program on maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max) and heart rate recovery(HR recovery) in male college students. Twenty male college students were randomly assigned to either the HIIT A group (n=10) or the MICT B group (n=10). The HIIT program consisted of repeated high-intensity bouts interspersed with recovery intervals, while the MICT program involved continuous aerobic exercise at a moderate intensity. Both programs were conducted for 8 weeks. Pre- and post-tests were performed to measure VO₂max and HR recovery. The HIIT group demonstrated a significant improvement in VO₂max (from 49.98±2.54 to 53.62±3.75 ml/kg/min, p<0.05), while the MICT group showed no significant changes (49.10±3.74 to 47.58±3.09 ml/kg/min, not significant). Although HR recovery decreased in both groups, the changes were not statistically significant. The findings suggest that HIIT is more effective than MICT in enhancing aerobic capacity within a relatively short training period. Given its time efficiency and effectiveness, HIIT may serve as a practical and beneficial exercise strategy for improving cardiovascular fitness among college students. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer intervention periods are recommended to confirm the long-term effects and applicability of HIIT in diverse populations.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-095542219
