인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This study analyzes the structural framework and legal implications of eUCP Version 2.0, focusing on how its key provisions—particularly Articles e3, e5, e7, and e11—establish the authenticity, integrity, and legal reliability of electronic records in electronic letters of credit (e-L/Cs). The research examines the procedures for electronic presentation, completeness notifications, and resubmission in cases of data corruption, showing how eUCP 2.0 reshapes documentary examination standards in digital trade environments.
Practical applications—including HSBC's first eUCP 2.0 transaction, Contour's automated completeness notification via smart contracts, Komgo's data-corruption resubmission system, and Bolero's electronic bills of lading—demonstrate that eUCP 2.0 is technologically feasible and enhances efficiency and transparency in trade finance operations.
A comparison between Singapore's MLETR-based framework and Korea's limited adoption of e-L/Cs reveals persistent constraints such as regulatory inconsistency, platform interoperability gaps, and unclear risk allocation. The study contributes to the literature by clarifying the legal-technical foundation of eUCP 2.0 and by identifying the institutional conditions—such as mutual recognition mechanisms and data standardization—necessary for its broader global adoption.
Practical applications—including HSBC's first eUCP 2.0 transaction, Contour's automated completeness notification via smart contracts, Komgo's data-corruption resubmission system, and Bolero's electronic bills of lading—demonstrate that eUCP 2.0 is technologically feasible and enhances efficiency and transparency in trade finance operations.
A comparison between Singapore's MLETR-based framework and Korea's limited adoption of e-L/Cs reveals persistent constraints such as regulatory inconsistency, platform interoperability gaps, and unclear risk allocation. The study contributes to the literature by clarifying the legal-technical foundation of eUCP 2.0 and by identifying the institutional conditions—such as mutual recognition mechanisms and data standardization—necessary for its broader global adoption.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-096400443
