인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This study analyzes the discourse structure of TORFL B1 Writing Task 2 and proposes a syntax-centered instructional framework. The task requires test-takers to summarize a text and present an opinion in a structured form, emphasizing discourse organization beyond sentence-level accuracy. Analysis of exam materials shows a consistent macro-structure of problem presentation, multiple perspectives, and evaluative conclusion. Learner data further reveal that high-scoring essays incorporate four key components—objectification, causality, contrast, and proposal—while lower-scoring essays often lack these elements. This indicates that assessment focuses on discourse-level completeness as well as grammatical accuracy.
Accordingly, this study identifies the syntactic devices associated with these components and suggests a staged instructional framework. It also reinterprets scoring criteria in relation to discourse structure, highlighting the need to align instruction with assessment.
Overall, the study shows that TORFL B1 Writing Task 2 evaluates structured discourse performance rather than topic knowledge, and it emphasizes the importance of systematically developing discourse competence.
Accordingly, this study identifies the syntactic devices associated with these components and suggests a staged instructional framework. It also reinterprets scoring criteria in relation to discourse structure, highlighting the need to align instruction with assessment.
Overall, the study shows that TORFL B1 Writing Task 2 evaluates structured discourse performance rather than topic knowledge, and it emphasizes the importance of systematically developing discourse competence.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-096552719