인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study is to categorize the “把” constructioninto displacement (transfer) typesand resultative types, and to systematically compare the event structures of each type through transitivity-weighted analysis. This approach aims to quantify the qualitative criteria of previous transitivity theories and to provide a clearer explanation of the differences in transitivity levels between the displacement and resultative types.
By applying weighted scores that reflect the functional importance of each transitivity feature, the overall transitivity rankings of the four constructions were found to be: Resultative Type I ＞ Displacement Type I ＞ Resultative Type II = Displacement Type II. Resultative Type I, in which the final state is most clearly realized and the patient undergoes complete change under the influence of the agent, received the highest transitivity score (24 points).
Following this, Displacement Type I, which centers on the physical movement of the patient and achieves high scores for individuation and affectedness, obtained 22 points, representing the second-highest transitivity level.
Resultative Type II, in which state changes occur gradually, scored 16.5 points due to relatively lower scores in the completeness and punctuality features. Similarly, Displacement Type II, which emphasizes patient transfer to a beneficiary, showed limited direct influence on the patient and low scores for individuation and affectedness, resulting in a relatively low transitivity score of 16.5 points.
By applying weighted scores that reflect the functional importance of each transitivity feature, the overall transitivity rankings of the four constructions were found to be: Resultative Type I ＞ Displacement Type I ＞ Resultative Type II = Displacement Type II. Resultative Type I, in which the final state is most clearly realized and the patient undergoes complete change under the influence of the agent, received the highest transitivity score (24 points).
Following this, Displacement Type I, which centers on the physical movement of the patient and achieves high scores for individuation and affectedness, obtained 22 points, representing the second-highest transitivity level.
Resultative Type II, in which state changes occur gradually, scored 16.5 points due to relatively lower scores in the completeness and punctuality features. Similarly, Displacement Type II, which emphasizes patient transfer to a beneficiary, showed limited direct influence on the patient and low scores for individuation and affectedness, resulting in a relatively low transitivity score of 16.5 points.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-26-02-096896690
