메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(국립부경대학교) (국립부경대학교)
저널정보
한국수산해양교육학회 수산해양교육연구 수산해양교육연구 제38권 제5호(통권 제143호)
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    This study preliminarily developed a scale for measuring teachers’ generative AI instructional integration experience and conducted a pilot examination of its item structure using expert content validation and two independent synthetic persona-based simulated response datasets. Based on prior studies on TPACK, AI self-efficacy, teacher AI competence, AI acceptance, and ethical use of generative AI, 40 initial items were developed across four dimensions: AI lesson preparation, AI lesson implementation, AI assessment and feedback, and AI use reflection. Twelve experts reviewed item relevance, clarity, representativeness, redundancy, and factor fit, resulting in 28 preliminary items. For exploratory factor analysis, 549 valid responses were obtained after excluding 11 inattentive cases from 560 Nemotron-Personas-KOREA-based simulated responses. Maximum likelihood extraction and direct oblimin rotation retained 20 items. For cross-validation within synthetic persona-based data, a separate synthetic persona sample(N=600), generated independently from the EFA sample, was used for confirmatory factor analysis. The one-factor model was inadequate, whereas the correlated four-factor model showed acceptable fit and the second-order model also showed acceptable fit. The findings provide preliminary evidence for the item structure of a multidimensional construct and demonstrate a methodological example for early-stage item refinement in the AI era. Because the simulated responses were generated from synthetic personas rather than actual teachers, the results should be interpreted as a supplementary pilot examination of item structure, not as final validation evidence for the teacher population.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기