인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This study examines the rhetorical devices embedded in the Letter to Philemon, analyzing their functions within the process of persuasion and exploring how these features are either preserved or weakened during translation. Specifically, it focuses on two key lexical items— σπλάγχνα(splanchna) in verses 7, 12, and 20 and ὀναίμην(onaimēn) in verse 20 —to analyze their respective rhetorical functions and propose possible directions for their translation.
This study combines epistolary and rhetorical analyses in order to identify the persuasive strategies emerging from the text itself. Rather than requiring a mechanical one-to-one correspondence between individual Greek words and Korean equivalents, it considers how rhetorical features such as repetition, wordplay, and lexical connections can be represented in translation.
The analysis shows that σπλάγχνα(splanchna) in the Letter to Philemon functions not merely as an expression of emotion but as a key rhetorical device that contributes to Paul’s strategy of personal identification and relational persuasion. The repetition and strategic placement of this term play an important role in the persuasive flow of the letter. Existing Korean translations, however, often render the word with different expressions, thereby weakening the linguistic unity and rhetorical emphasis established by the original text. Similarly, ὀναίμην(onaimēn) functions as a form of wordplay that extends the meaning of the name Onesimus and reinforces the semantic parallelism and strategy of identification between verses 11 and 20. Many Korean translations, however, render the term according to its conventional sense, such as “joy” or “favor”, thereby making its rhetorical connection with the “useful” motif in verse 11 less apparent.
Based on this analysis, this study argues that translations of the Letter to Philemon should consider not only the natural rendering of individual words but also rhetorical features such as repetition, wordplay, and lexical connections. It therefore proposes a translation approach that seeks, as far as the target language permits, to make visible the rhetorical relationships associated with splanchna and onaimēn in the letter.
This study combines epistolary and rhetorical analyses in order to identify the persuasive strategies emerging from the text itself. Rather than requiring a mechanical one-to-one correspondence between individual Greek words and Korean equivalents, it considers how rhetorical features such as repetition, wordplay, and lexical connections can be represented in translation.
The analysis shows that σπλάγχνα(splanchna) in the Letter to Philemon functions not merely as an expression of emotion but as a key rhetorical device that contributes to Paul’s strategy of personal identification and relational persuasion. The repetition and strategic placement of this term play an important role in the persuasive flow of the letter. Existing Korean translations, however, often render the word with different expressions, thereby weakening the linguistic unity and rhetorical emphasis established by the original text. Similarly, ὀναίμην(onaimēn) functions as a form of wordplay that extends the meaning of the name Onesimus and reinforces the semantic parallelism and strategy of identification between verses 11 and 20. Many Korean translations, however, render the term according to its conventional sense, such as “joy” or “favor”, thereby making its rhetorical connection with the “useful” motif in verse 11 less apparent.
Based on this analysis, this study argues that translations of the Letter to Philemon should consider not only the natural rendering of individual words but also rhetorical features such as repetition, wordplay, and lexical connections. It therefore proposes a translation approach that seeks, as far as the target language permits, to make visible the rhetorical relationships associated with splanchna and onaimēn in the letter.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
