인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This study investigates the usage and diachronic shifts of personal expressions in Korean translations of the Bible and proposes a systematic framework to ensure translation consistency. In the Hebrew and Greek originals, personal references are often unmarked, relying on articles, participles, or relative clauses. Consequently, when translated into Korean — a language with a highly articulated honorific system and explicit particle markers — translators have frequently interchanged terms such as ‘bun’ (exalted dependent noun), ‘i’ (archaic/exalted dependent noun), ‘-in’ (suffix), ‘saram’ (noun), and ‘ja’ (dependent noun). By contrasting original texts and foreign translations (English, Chinese, and Japanese) with various historical Korean versions through digital knowledge infrastructures like Paratext and HolyNet, this paper analyzes the structural causes of these translational inconsistencies.
To resolve these discrepancies while remaining faithful to native Korean grammatical norms and practical linguistic usages, this study establishes a two-dimensional classification model based on two key axes: (1) Individuality vs. Collectivity/Categorization, and (2) Honorific Hierarchy. First, regarding proper nouns denoting locations or ethnic groups, the suffix ‘-in’ is designated for legal, national, or collective identities, whereas the native word ‘saram’ is restricted to individual, relational personhood. Second, in terms of honorifics, the exalted term ‘bun’ is strictly applied as a third-person reference to divine entities (e.g., God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit). The term ‘i’ is limited to divine first-person self-references to accommodate auditory clarity and natural phrasing. Lastly, ‘ja’ is conceptualized not as a derogatory term, but as a neutral, stylistic marker representing an ‘attribute-bearing human’ when modified by descriptive clauses.
This research holds significant interdisciplinary value spanning biblical translation, historical Korean linguistics, pragmatics, and corpus-based analysis. By presenting concrete revision guidelines for ambiguous verses, this paper provides a practical blueprint for future Bible revision projects and automated translation verification in digital environments.
To resolve these discrepancies while remaining faithful to native Korean grammatical norms and practical linguistic usages, this study establishes a two-dimensional classification model based on two key axes: (1) Individuality vs. Collectivity/Categorization, and (2) Honorific Hierarchy. First, regarding proper nouns denoting locations or ethnic groups, the suffix ‘-in’ is designated for legal, national, or collective identities, whereas the native word ‘saram’ is restricted to individual, relational personhood. Second, in terms of honorifics, the exalted term ‘bun’ is strictly applied as a third-person reference to divine entities (e.g., God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit). The term ‘i’ is limited to divine first-person self-references to accommodate auditory clarity and natural phrasing. Lastly, ‘ja’ is conceptualized not as a derogatory term, but as a neutral, stylistic marker representing an ‘attribute-bearing human’ when modified by descriptive clauses.
This research holds significant interdisciplinary value spanning biblical translation, historical Korean linguistics, pragmatics, and corpus-based analysis. By presenting concrete revision guidelines for ambiguous verses, this paper provides a practical blueprint for future Bible revision projects and automated translation verification in digital environments.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
