인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
The verb-sensitive approach to the English dative alternation proposed by Rappaport Hovav and Levin (2008) assumes that subtypes of alternating verbs differ in their association with two meanings- caused possession and caused motion. The purpose of this paper is to assess the empirical validity of this approach in comparison with that of the uniform multiple meaning approach, which takes all alternating verbs to have caused-possession and caused-motion meanings and to encode caused motion in the to-variant. We report two rating experiments designed to test speakers’ judgments of dative sentences which describe events of caused possession but do not involve caused motion. The results of the experiments show that to-dative sentences describing such events are judged invariably acceptable by speakers when factors of givenness and heaviness are controlled for. This evidence argues against the uniform multiple meaning approach and supports the proposal of the verb-sensitive approach that give-type verbs have only a caused-possession meaning independently of the variants in which they appear.
#caused motion
#caused possession
#dative alternation
#event type
#give-type verbs
#verb sensitivity
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Major Approaches to the Association of the Dative Alternation Variants and Event Types
- 3. Experimental Data
- 4. Conclusion
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-701-000349351
