인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Korean amended Trust code(Capital Market and Financial Investment Services Provider Act) has provisions on testamentary trust, will-substitute- trust(there is no similar trust in common law) and Consecutive beneficiaries trust and so on. this article discusses some issues related to new trust types. these type do not match up with typical trust types in common law. this article focus on discrepancies between trust code and civil law, trust code and trust business act.
Discrepancies between trust code and civil law has two problem. one is a conflict with heritorship, the other is about rule against perpetuities
First, A typical institution as a device of succession in the Civil Law is heritorship in the law of succession. but now, most the aged want to deal with inherited property by his own will, not by inheritance Act.
The purpose of new types in trust code is to meet the aged"s demand. but new provisons come into conflict with heritorship in civil law. - On Korean Civil law, an inheritee should guarantees legal reserve of inheritance for all legal heirs.
To encourage the Provision of new type trust, Considerable modification of the existing system(legal reserve of inheritance) is needed. because testamentary trust, will-substitute-trust and Consecutive beneficiaries trust infringe on heirs rights.
Secondary, Consecutive beneficiaries trust in korean trust code has no limitation of perpetuity period, different from Japan trust code as mother law. so, some call for the reform of perpetuity period. when occasion demands. others content that koran trust code have no use for perpetuity period provision.
Ministry of Justice publish the cause of no perpetuity period provision in the official gazette. they say that trust is not inheritance. usually civil law does not regulate duration of right.
But in many case the rule against remoteness is necessary to protect legal stability of interested persons.
Discrepancies between trust code and trust business act is restriction on a fiduciary capacity in trust business act. in koran someone want to set up trust business have to accreditation from Financial Services Commission. but new type trusts are for personal purpose, to help a ward, minor enterprisers with intent to succeed the management rights. we need to streamline administrative procedures.
Finally I hope that many jurisconsults take a profound interest in the nature of trust to do a few loose ends in my search to tie up.
Discrepancies between trust code and civil law has two problem. one is a conflict with heritorship, the other is about rule against perpetuities
First, A typical institution as a device of succession in the Civil Law is heritorship in the law of succession. but now, most the aged want to deal with inherited property by his own will, not by inheritance Act.
The purpose of new types in trust code is to meet the aged"s demand. but new provisons come into conflict with heritorship in civil law. - On Korean Civil law, an inheritee should guarantees legal reserve of inheritance for all legal heirs.
To encourage the Provision of new type trust, Considerable modification of the existing system(legal reserve of inheritance) is needed. because testamentary trust, will-substitute-trust and Consecutive beneficiaries trust infringe on heirs rights.
Secondary, Consecutive beneficiaries trust in korean trust code has no limitation of perpetuity period, different from Japan trust code as mother law. so, some call for the reform of perpetuity period. when occasion demands. others content that koran trust code have no use for perpetuity period provision.
Ministry of Justice publish the cause of no perpetuity period provision in the official gazette. they say that trust is not inheritance. usually civil law does not regulate duration of right.
But in many case the rule against remoteness is necessary to protect legal stability of interested persons.
Discrepancies between trust code and trust business act is restriction on a fiduciary capacity in trust business act. in koran someone want to set up trust business have to accreditation from Financial Services Commission. but new type trusts are for personal purpose, to help a ward, minor enterprisers with intent to succeed the management rights. we need to streamline administrative procedures.
Finally I hope that many jurisconsults take a profound interest in the nature of trust to do a few loose ends in my search to tie up.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-003338590