메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
저널정보
한국종교학회 종교연구 종교연구 제74집 제4호
오류 신고하기

피인용 6

검색

    초록·키워드

    Paul Ricoeur dealt with the issue of evil through various works. Especially in this article, first, after suggesting three types of theodicy, I examined how he understood evil in Fallible Man and in The Symbolism of Evil. Second, I analyzed how he criticized theodicy and suggested new responses to the problems of evil in “Evil, a Challenge to Philosophy and Theology” and in “Memory of Suffering.” In the Fallible Man and The Symbolism of Evil, he showed that evil is an aporia which belongs to the realm of human responsibility and works beyond the boundary of human beings at the same time. Evil is evidently a human phenomenon which is both personal and communal, but the concrete experiences of evil witnessed and attested in symbols and myths of evil clearly refer to ‘already being there of evil’ and its cosmic structure. In the “Evil, a Challenge to Philosophy and Theology,” Ricoeur argued that in the Western theodicies all the issues of evil are understood within the boundary of human history following Augustine’s doctrine of original sin. That is why they have not properly responded to nor outspoken the concrete experiences of the reality of evil. In this regard, he suggested action, wisdom, and catharsis through the synthesis of feeling and wisdom as alternatives of those theodicies. Furthermore, in the “Memory of Suffering,” he showed that we can have the capacity to act and resist against evil when the wisdom meets memory of suffering. Considering the practical approach into the problem of evil by Paul Ricoeur, we need to re-think the way how we deal with the issues of evil.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-205-001075367