인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
A historical appellation of Samhan is used to categorize southern part of Korean peninsula into three regions such as Mahan(馬韓) Jinhan(辰韓) Byŏnhan(弁韓). The period of Samhan was from BC 2<SUP>nd</SUP> to AD 3<SUP>rd</SUP> century before when these Hans-Mahan Jinhan Byŏnhanreplaced as Baekje, Silla, and Gaya respectively.
However, It engendered dissimilar history awareness from truth of Samhan since 6<SUP>th</SUP> century. For example, the history of Samhan has not been regarded as the history of southern part of Korean peninsula but that of the whole peninsula and eastern part of Liao-ho(遼河). Futhermore it is gradually used as the appellation to describe Three Kingdoms: Koguryo, Baekje, and Silla, because the expression of Samhan in China was used for indication of Eastern Barbarians located in eastern part of Liao-ho. The reasons why Chinese historians thought the part of Liao-ho and Korean peninsula as Samhan are that they thought as the related region to Gija Joseon(箕子朝鮮), and the descendant of Gija(箕子) according to its custom handed down Gija’s in their perception of history.
These sort of Chinese history awareness was transmitted to Silla’s historian. According to historical material of Silla, the term of Samhan emerged after the 7<SUP>th</SUP> century. Mostly historians in Silla used the term to present its unification and territories they conquered. However there was not one to one correspondence recognition between Samhan and Three kingdoms until the 9<SUP>th</SUP> century.
On the other hand, Three kingdoms in Korean peninsula was demonstrated as Samhan by ancient Japan since 8<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus the appellation of Samhan has historicity and universality to present Korean peninsula and other regions through the ancient East Asian history. According to this perspective, I think that Silla used the term of Samhan to emphasis their unified nation with its characteristic.
However, It engendered dissimilar history awareness from truth of Samhan since 6<SUP>th</SUP> century. For example, the history of Samhan has not been regarded as the history of southern part of Korean peninsula but that of the whole peninsula and eastern part of Liao-ho(遼河). Futhermore it is gradually used as the appellation to describe Three Kingdoms: Koguryo, Baekje, and Silla, because the expression of Samhan in China was used for indication of Eastern Barbarians located in eastern part of Liao-ho. The reasons why Chinese historians thought the part of Liao-ho and Korean peninsula as Samhan are that they thought as the related region to Gija Joseon(箕子朝鮮), and the descendant of Gija(箕子) according to its custom handed down Gija’s in their perception of history.
These sort of Chinese history awareness was transmitted to Silla’s historian. According to historical material of Silla, the term of Samhan emerged after the 7<SUP>th</SUP> century. Mostly historians in Silla used the term to present its unification and territories they conquered. However there was not one to one correspondence recognition between Samhan and Three kingdoms until the 9<SUP>th</SUP> century.
On the other hand, Three kingdoms in Korean peninsula was demonstrated as Samhan by ancient Japan since 8<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus the appellation of Samhan has historicity and universality to present Korean peninsula and other regions through the ancient East Asian history. According to this perspective, I think that Silla used the term of Samhan to emphasis their unified nation with its characteristic.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-000865173
