인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
The requisite for making duty of care with respect to marine accidents under the Maritime Safety Act has several problems so that it shallbe interpreted and reformed as follows.
First, the Maritime Safety Act does not have a substantive provision with regard to ‘the definition of the marine accident’, but it shallbe an accident related to safety of ships and sailing under the purpose of the act.
Second, the Act imposes duty of care on the master as well as the ship-owner in the event of the marine accident, but it is legislatively appropriate that the regulation shall be rescinded (removed) and limited to the master Third, ‘the necessary measure’, ‘the scope of the report’, and ‘the fulfillment scope of the order’among requisites which a person has to fulfill in the case of the marine accident shall be established under the benefit and protection of law for public interests preventing the obstacle and danger of the marine traffic.
Fourth, a necessary measure would not obviously need in advance of a report because the purpose of the Act is to secure the smooth traffic of the vessel flow, even though it provides that one shall notify after necessary measure in the event of the marine accident.
Fifth, it is not reasonable that the necessary duty of care does not apply to a person who violates itself although it is the most important method to secure the safety of the marine traffic among ‘necessary duty of care’, ‘duty of notice (report)’, and ‘duty of order’.
Sixth, legislation is needed to impose sanctions which divide marine accidents resulting from intent and negligence into no fault.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
