인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
In Korea, confirming the identity of persons or adult identity verification on a visiting website or E-commerce activity on the internet is processed by asking users to become registered on it. There are several tools to confirm the identity of an individual on the internet such as Resident registration number, i-Pin, Public Verification Certificate, Cell phone certificate and Credit card certificate etc. Among them, Resident registration number is mostly common used and bound to be easily drained or stolen while in the process of storage or forwarding due to the internet characteristic of open-end network. Indeed, it happens often that draining or stealing of Resident registration number on the internet since it has been commercialized. By the way, Resident registration number includes important and sensitive personal information such as date of birth, gender and place of birth. Also, Resident registration number could be used as a medium of collecting personal information very easily. Thus, draining or misusing of Resident registration number may cause invasion of privacy and mental as well as economic damages against individuals. More serious effect is expected due to the limitation and weakness of Korean Resident registration number that is impossible to be discarded or changed when it’s drained or stolen. Because the confirming the identity on the internet is processed with correspondence of Resident registration number and name, there are many cases of steal and misuse of other’s Resident registration number in Korea. In this situation confirming the identity by Resident registration number is not effective and need reformation. In other major countries different from in Korea, individual can be a registered user and use the service without confirmation process using personal identification number for the E-commerce or entertainment website. People just need to enter their name and e-mail address, and basic payment information when it’s charging service. For instance, name and e-mail address are only necessary when someone wants to be a registered user of international internet shopping mall like eBay or Amazon. Thus, to prevent damages and diminish any harm from stealing or misuse of Resident registration number, we need to consider limit and prohibit confirmation of the identity with Resident registration number. Internet service providers should use other tools when it is necessary to confirm the identity of an individual for operating their services. Confirming the identity using Resident registration number should be permitted only when it’s regulated under the law. In addition, it is desirable to revise the law in order to promote use of other tools of confirming the identity of individual and regulate minimum inevitable use of the Resident registration number.
#주민등록번호
#개인식별번호
#대체수단
#i-PIN
#본인확인
#전자상거래
#개인정보
#Resident Registration Number
#Personal Identification Number
#Alternatives of Resident Registration Number
#i-PIN(Internet Personal Identification Number)
#Personal Certification
#Electronic Commerce
#Personal Information
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서설
- Ⅱ. 주민등록번호에 의한 본인확인의 현황과 문제점
- Ⅲ. 인터넷상 주민등록번호에 의한 본인확인의 실효성
- Ⅳ. 주요 외국의 개인식별번호 제도와 그 사용제한
- Ⅴ. 인터넷상 주민등록번호에 의한 본인확인 가능 법규정
- Ⅵ. 인터넷상 주민등록번호의 대체수단의 도입과 법제화
- Ⅶ. 결어
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-002628159
