인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Regime transformation after the Cold War has been linked to personal or group interests under a certain communist regime, with some scholars arguing it leads to the western style of democracy and others claiming it creates something different. This article offers an imagination, based upon the assumption that moral norms of the regime is the underlying cause for regime transformation, about the more just and more peaceful regime transformation.
Moral norms construct morally good character and right behaviours in the regime. Throughout the history, they has been used to foster favorable outcomes of the leaders, not of the people in the regime. That is why there are always possibilities of hypocrisy. This hypocrisy loses the leaders’ power and leads to regime transformation as it is revealed, by undercutting their legitimacy. Then, how could we imagine a transformation to a totally new regime, which is just and peaceful, when we always have to suspect our leader’s hypocrisy? Is not it just circulatory?
To answer that question, this article broadens the scope of the regime transformation research, suggesting a meeting place for social science and theology. Social science is helpful for us to understand our problems in this world, but it has its limits of imagining the future. Whereas, theology gives us hope and imaginations for the better future with God, the Kingdom of God, though many times the outcomes of the theological research do not seem very concrete as those of social science do. In this regards, this article argues that social scientific research can show us the limitation of moral norms constructed by human beings in just and peaceful regime transformation as theology can give us the possibility of the new imagination in it, which is the image of god.
Moral norms construct morally good character and right behaviours in the regime. Throughout the history, they has been used to foster favorable outcomes of the leaders, not of the people in the regime. That is why there are always possibilities of hypocrisy. This hypocrisy loses the leaders’ power and leads to regime transformation as it is revealed, by undercutting their legitimacy. Then, how could we imagine a transformation to a totally new regime, which is just and peaceful, when we always have to suspect our leader’s hypocrisy? Is not it just circulatory?
To answer that question, this article broadens the scope of the regime transformation research, suggesting a meeting place for social science and theology. Social science is helpful for us to understand our problems in this world, but it has its limits of imagining the future. Whereas, theology gives us hope and imaginations for the better future with God, the Kingdom of God, though many times the outcomes of the theological research do not seem very concrete as those of social science do. In this regards, this article argues that social scientific research can show us the limitation of moral norms constructed by human beings in just and peaceful regime transformation as theology can give us the possibility of the new imagination in it, which is the image of god.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-230-001578733
