메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(서울신학대학교)
저널정보
대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제36호
오류 신고하기

피인용 4

검색

    초록·키워드

    This article seeks to propose better Korean translations of some cultic terms in the Book of Leviticus. There are several important cultic terms for understanding the cultic system in the Book of Leviticus. Most Korean versions have used traditional translations for such terms and phrases. However, those translations sometimes prevent us from understanding the meaning of the texts accurately. Here, several terms have been chosen for discussion.
    The first term is ?????? (Lev 4:3, 14, 20, 21, etc). ?????? is usually translated as ‘sin offering.’ But some scholars like J. Milgrom and J. Hartley suggest translating this term as ‘purification offering’ because ?????? is not related to ???? (to sin), but rather to ????? (piel of ???? ,? to clean or to purify), and because the blood of ?????? is not to applied to human, but to sancta which has to be purified from uncleanness (Lev 16:16). But the ritual of‘ ??????? ’, which means the goal of ?????? ,? is not limited to purification but extends to expiation and even to holiness. Thus, So, we may translate ?????? as ‘sanctification offering.’
    The second term is ????? (Lev 5:15, 16, 18, 19, etc). ????? is usually translated as ‘guilt offering.’ If ????? is translated as ‘guilt offering’, we cannot distinguish ????? from ?????? .? There are two different characteristics of ????? from those of ?????? .? The first characteristic is that the sin for ????? is ???? which means unfaithfulness to God. And ???? refers to two kinds of sins ? The first one is about the misusage of holy things and the other is about making false oaths by God’s name in order to acquire neighbors’ properties. These two sins are connected to the misusage of the properties of God and others. The second characteristic is that the sinner has to add a fifth part to the original property to the priests or to the original owner. That is why we may translate ????? as ‘reparation offering’ even if the purpose of ????? is similar to .???????
    The third terms are ???????? and ???????? (Lev 7:14, 30, etc). ???????? is usually translated as ‘heave offering.’ But ???????? is not always related to the cultic context. In the non-cultic context, ???????? is used as ‘gift’, ‘tax’, ‘contribution’, or ‘offering’ (Exod 25:2; 30:13; 35:5; Num 5:9; 20:26, etc). Even in the cultic context, ???????? is like an offering without any cultic action like lifting something (Exod 29:27; Lev 7:14, 28-34, etc). Rather it is to offer a gift to Yahweh (????????). Accordingly, ???????? can be translated as ‘offering’, or ‘gift.’ And ???????? is traditionally translated as ‘wave offering.’ But some recent English versions like NRSV and NJPS translated it as ‘elevation offering’ because ????? (hiphil of ????)may mean a cultic action like elevating the offering before Yahweh (??????? ???????), rather than waving the offering (Exod 20:25; Isa 10:15; 13:2; 19:16, etc). We may therefore translate ???????? into ‘heave offering’, or ‘elevation offering.’

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-001394178