인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
Full-text AI
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
This article investigates the participation of anti-Japanese war by the Soviet Armed Forces and it"s entry in the Korean peninsula, and clarifies the assessment on the role of Soviet army about the liberation of korea from the view of Russia.
After the surrender of Japan, the Soviet Union abandoned to seize the whole of the Korean peninsula, because it attached great importance to the cooperation between USA and USSR, and considered that the future of the Korean peninsula would be resolved by related powers, not a specific country. However, in contrast to early expectations, the entry of the ground forces of Soviet Union on the Korean peninsula was due to the united states" denial of the separated occupation of Japanese territory.
The surrender of Japan resulted in the 8.15 National liberation, which was caused by America"s dropping of atomic bombs, weakening of Japanese national power through a prolonged war and the ant-japanese war participation of Soviet army. It is difficult to call the Allies including the Soviet Union ‘liberators", because Allies were responsible for the division of Koreas though they actually liberated Korea from Japanese rule. However, the Russian side maintained the logic of 8.15 liberation by the Soviet army. Even if there were difference of the tone of arguments divided into periods, the fundamental principle did not change. This view of Russia makes a difference with North Korea"s assertion that emphasizes idea of ‘Juche’(self-reliance).
Therefore, it is necessary for South Korea and Russia to build a logic ‘liberation of Korea’ to agree with each other, revising Russia"s excessive narratives for the liberation of the Korean peninsula.
After the surrender of Japan, the Soviet Union abandoned to seize the whole of the Korean peninsula, because it attached great importance to the cooperation between USA and USSR, and considered that the future of the Korean peninsula would be resolved by related powers, not a specific country. However, in contrast to early expectations, the entry of the ground forces of Soviet Union on the Korean peninsula was due to the united states" denial of the separated occupation of Japanese territory.
The surrender of Japan resulted in the 8.15 National liberation, which was caused by America"s dropping of atomic bombs, weakening of Japanese national power through a prolonged war and the ant-japanese war participation of Soviet army. It is difficult to call the Allies including the Soviet Union ‘liberators", because Allies were responsible for the division of Koreas though they actually liberated Korea from Japanese rule. However, the Russian side maintained the logic of 8.15 liberation by the Soviet army. Even if there were difference of the tone of arguments divided into periods, the fundamental principle did not change. This view of Russia makes a difference with North Korea"s assertion that emphasizes idea of ‘Juche’(self-reliance).
Therefore, it is necessary for South Korea and Russia to build a logic ‘liberation of Korea’ to agree with each other, revising Russia"s excessive narratives for the liberation of the Korean peninsula.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001897121