인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This article explores the idealist philosophy of socialism that Liang Qichao, Zhang Dongsun, and Zhang Junmai formulated in the aftermath of the First World War. These Chinese philosophers believed that the global catastrophe of the First World War resulted significantly from the moral bankruptcy of the modern Western civilization of capitalism. They thought that this capitalist civilization was founded on the basis of the positivist philosophy that explains the world, including human beings, in accordance with the inevitable laws of natural movements, resulting in the loss of morality as any important issue of consideration in philosophy. As they shared this critique of positivism with western thinkers, they joined the global revolt against positivism and tried to construct an alternative vision of the world, particularly a vision of socialism that they saw as a sign of the retrieval of morality after the war. In opposition to the Marxist materialist conception of history that was then interpreted mainly as the theory of economic determinism in China, Liang and the two Zhangs tried to reinterpret the meaning of socialism with a special stress on free human will as a motivating force for social change. While suggesting morality, ethics, and culture as important issues in a socialist movement, they constructed an alternative vision of socialism as a global-historical project to build a morally desirable future, rather than as an inevitable consequence of natural movement of history.
While concentrating on critiques of the moral bankruptcy of capitalism, however, their idealist theory of socialism neglected to acknowledge the contradictions imbedded in the social relations of production under capitalism. As they believed that China should solve the problem of poverty that resulted from the lack of productive force to save the Chinese people, they tended to stress the necessity of improving China’s productive force without any consideration of the relations of production or class relations. During the so-called socialist debate, they themselves interpreted historical materialism as an evolutionary theory of economic development and appropriated this revolutionary theory to support their advocacy for capitalist development in China as a precondition for genuine socialism. In doing so, these philosophers themselves fell in a trap of “inevitability” (the positivist logic that they aimed to overcome until one year ago) - not the inevitability of socialism but the inevitability of capitalism -. By endorsing the necessity of capitalist development and relegating socialism to the future, they neglected to address any problems in the relations of production and, because of their failure to address social injustice and unfairness, their idealist theory lost any transformative significance.
While concentrating on critiques of the moral bankruptcy of capitalism, however, their idealist theory of socialism neglected to acknowledge the contradictions imbedded in the social relations of production under capitalism. As they believed that China should solve the problem of poverty that resulted from the lack of productive force to save the Chinese people, they tended to stress the necessity of improving China’s productive force without any consideration of the relations of production or class relations. During the so-called socialist debate, they themselves interpreted historical materialism as an evolutionary theory of economic development and appropriated this revolutionary theory to support their advocacy for capitalist development in China as a precondition for genuine socialism. In doing so, these philosophers themselves fell in a trap of “inevitability” (the positivist logic that they aimed to overcome until one year ago) - not the inevitability of socialism but the inevitability of capitalism -. By endorsing the necessity of capitalist development and relegating socialism to the future, they neglected to address any problems in the relations of production and, because of their failure to address social injustice and unfairness, their idealist theory lost any transformative significance.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-910-001484690
