인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
초록·키워드
Disbursements of small-scale credit to poor entrepreneurial households in developing countries have become a popular tool for promoting self-sufficiency and alleviating poverty. The success of such programs, however, has been inconsistent across self-sufficiency and poverty measures. This study explores the effects of small-scale loans, household assets, and other household characteristics on household income. The study uses longitudinal survey data collected by the World Bank and the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies from over 1,700 households in rural Bangladesh. The results suggest that microloans disbursed by microfinance institutions and other formal programs have a positive impact on income for borrowers. Loans received from relatives and other noninstitutional moneylenders, however, only benefit male borrowers. The findings document differential impacts by loan source, gender, education assets, and labor assets. Households that are resource poor in land assets and education, benefit the most from receiving small-scale credit. This study provides important policy insights. The results suggest that one-size-fits-all approaches to development finance may not be appropriate given that program outcomes can be sensitive to credit source, borrower’s gender, and other household characteristics. To address endogeneity issues in the data, the study relies on a quasi-experiment survey design to reduce bias in the estimates. A quasi-experiment imposes a cutoff criterion for eligibility to allow us to trace treatment group impacts. A panel data model was also used to further control for unobserved effects.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.