인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This study considered urban agriculture as an object to be consistently maintained and conserved rather than transient or residual one and approached the urban agriculture from the point of view that regards it as one of local agriculture. In particular, this study estimated the recognition on agriculture of urban residents and the willingness to pay for the purpose of agricultural conservation. Main results can be put in order as follows;
First, as for the value of urban agriculture, urban residents gave precedence to the provision of the landscape green zone. And urban residents gave the next precedence to the inheritance value for the next generation. Second, the recognition on conserving the urban agriculture is as follows; In terms of the recognition, the response that should use urban agriculture as other uses through external expansion was higher than the response that should use urban agriculture as a traditional agricultural form. For this purpose, respondents preferred the environmental-friendly development through experience programs and agriculture. Third, the urban resident's willingness to pay the fund for conservation of urban agriculture was 39.6%. It was shown that the fund should be used for the maintenance of landscape, site of field practice, supply of agricultural products, prevention of disaster or conservation of region in the descending order. The willingness to pay the estimated monthly average fund per household was 2,623 won. When applying the willingness percentage to pay, 39.6%, to the applied regions, the willingness to pay was shown as 216 million won for monthly average payment, and 2,592 million won for annual average payment.
First, as for the value of urban agriculture, urban residents gave precedence to the provision of the landscape green zone. And urban residents gave the next precedence to the inheritance value for the next generation. Second, the recognition on conserving the urban agriculture is as follows; In terms of the recognition, the response that should use urban agriculture as other uses through external expansion was higher than the response that should use urban agriculture as a traditional agricultural form. For this purpose, respondents preferred the environmental-friendly development through experience programs and agriculture. Third, the urban resident's willingness to pay the fund for conservation of urban agriculture was 39.6%. It was shown that the fund should be used for the maintenance of landscape, site of field practice, supply of agricultural products, prevention of disaster or conservation of region in the descending order. The willingness to pay the estimated monthly average fund per household was 2,623 won. When applying the willingness percentage to pay, 39.6%, to the applied regions, the willingness to pay was shown as 216 million won for monthly average payment, and 2,592 million won for annual average payment.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-309-000576742
